Friday, June 21, 2013

Why the Protesters in Brazil are Wrong

   



In a globalized world such as ours, there is a tendency for important, localized events to become global every once in a while. This seems to be the case in the current situation in Brazil. Most people around the world seem to be taking the protester’s side in this case. Personally, I think this is a mistake, and I would like to explain why I think that way.
            One of my big issues with the protesters is that they seem to be uncertain about what they are actually protesting against. In reality, this whole affair originated as a specific protest against the rise of public transportation fares. So far so good. After all, the people had the right to protest against the rise of prices in an area that is of vital importance to them. Regardless of being right or wrong, at the very least they had a specific complaint in mind. It was a request that could be easily understood: lower the price of bus tickets to their former rates!
The problem however, is that this reasonable, easily understandable request, became something much more generic and, consequentially, more confusing and less clear. This is true to the extent that most people observing these events from all four corners of the world can’t even figure out what exactly the protests in Brazil are about. If not, read the article below and note how in the comments section people can’t even agree on what the object of  the protest is:


I believe this is a huge problem since when a protest loses its focus it also tends to lose its legitimacy. After all, what are the protests in Brazil really about? At first, people were protesting against the raise in public-transportation fares. Clear enough. As a result, previous prices were reinstated as The Guardian reports. So, one would think that the protests would cease because the initial request of the people was fulfilled. Yet this is obviously not the case here.
In fact, it seems that the protests become bigger and meaner every day that passes. Logically, one can only conclude that this is because the original protest has mutated into a different, more complex creature. And this is when things get messy. At this moment the protests in Brazil are not about bus fares any more. They are about the Confederations Cup, the World Cup and the 2016 summer Olympics. Not only that, they’re about the corruption in Brazilian politics, the rise of inflation in Brazil, the lack of security and any other things that are wrong in the country.
As a result of the diversification of the motives of the revolt, what we have now is an all-encompassing massive popular protest. This is what the Brazilian government has to deal with at this point.
Let us now consider the criticisms against the three big sporting competitions: the 2013 FIFA Confederations Cup, the 2014 FIFA World Cup and the 2016 summer Olympics.
The most common form of criticism against these competitions is directed towards the Brazilian government for having allowed these competitions to take place in Brazil. The protesters argue that the money devoted to the organizing of these competitions would have been better spent in areas like education and healthcare.
This is a quite objective and reasonable claim. I would even go further and say that this is a claim that I could embrace myself. I think however that some further considerations should also be taken into account.
First, it should be noted that undertaking these efforts will give prestige and visibility to the country. Investing money on healthcare and education is crucial, but this doesn’t mean that culture should be altogether discarded. In fact, I would argue that a truly prosperous and successful country in not simply a country that can feed and educate its citizens. It should do more than that. It should go beyond. It should make its residents proud to live within its borders. This is something that food and shelter alone cannot guarantee but that culture and sports are adept at achieving in conjunction with the former.   
Secondly, it is nothing short of wishful thinking to assume that the problems regarding education and healthcare in Brazil are directly related to the Confederations Cup/World Cup and Olympics, and that they would be solved if these competitions didn’t occur in Brazil in this period. The truth is that even if these competitions weren’t held in Brazil public education and healthcare would still be just as bad. These are deep structural problems and need long-term solutions in order to be solved. The lack of capacity of the Brazilian people to think long-term is more harmful to the country than one hundred FIFA world cups.

Finally, it is important to consider that, in any case, these demonstrations came too late. Had they occurred earlier, at the time when Brazil was still applying to host these competitions, I would have welcomed them and praised them. The Brazilian people would have demonstrated seriousness and democratic spirit by actively trying to shift the country’s decision making. But these demonstrations are happening now, precisely when the confederations cup is taking place! The protesters cannot possibly achieve anything good at this point. In reality, what the Brazilian people is effectively doing is telling the world that they are not able to uphold their commitments, which is essentially what organizing a first-tier international event amounts to. They are telling the world, in the way of convoluted and at times even violent protests that Brazil is a third world country incapable of exercising the sort of leadership in the world stage that one would expect from a country with its size, population and resources.   



Sources:
-The Guardian
-MARCA